Skip to main content
Home / Sayari vs ProcessUnity
SAYARI VS PROCESSUNITY

ProcessUnity manages the risk workflow.
Guide manages the risk – without the vendor stack that makes ProcessUnity work.

ProcessUnity is a workflow orchestrator that requires external data subscriptions to produce meaningful risk intelligence for sanctions, AML, and beneficial ownership. Guide provides the data and the workflow in a single product – built on a World Model of 1.5B entities, deployed with pre-configured workflows from day one. For organizations consolidating their vendor stack, Guide replaces ProcessUnity and the data vendors it depends on simultaneously.

See Sayari in action

Request a live demo – we’ll run your entities through the world model.

No spam. We respect your privacy.
91%
Enterprise risk data siloed across platforms
74%
Burden of manual monitoring and assessments
50%
Monitored entities are not comprehensively screened
65%
Lack visibility into beneficial ownership structures
ProcessUnity Foundation

ProcessUnity provides TPRM through vendor assessment workflows, risk scoring frameworks, compliance documentation, and audit trails. Strengths: assessment process automation, risk rating templates, documentation management, compliance reporting. Model: assessment-first, questionnaire-driven ratings.

Sayari Foundation

Sayari provides entity intelligence: 10.6B+ primary-source corporate registry records, beneficial ownership traversal, sanctions screening, and continuous monitoring. Risk ratings are built on intelligence, not questionnaires alone. Model: evidence-first, intelligence-driven.

The Question to Ask

Are your risk ratings evidence-based or response-based? ProcessUnity excels at rating processes. Sayari provides the intelligence evidence – ownership, sanctions, regulatory exposure – that should determine the rating itself.

Quick Verdict

Intelligence Layer
Entity + Ownership Data
vs
Assessment Framework
Risk Evidence
Primary-Source Data
vs
Questionnaire Responses
Continuous Monitoring
Real-Time Alerts
vs
Periodic Assessment
Beneficial Ownership
Automated Discovery
vs
Manual Documentation

Detailed Comparison

Capability Sayari ProcessUnity
Intelligence & Evidence
Primary-Source Data
Authoritative entity intelligence
10.6B+ records corporate registries, 250+ jurisdictions
Not included assessment framework only
Beneficial Ownership Discovery
Automated UBO traversal and mapping
Automated traversal multi-hop ownership chains
Manual entry only relies on questionnaire documentation
Sanctions & Compliance Screening
Entity-level continuous screening
Real-time monitoring ownership, PEP, sanctions, adverse media
Via integrations no native screening capability
Assessment & Rating
Risk Scoring Methodology
How risk ratings are determined
Evidence-based intelligence-driven risk determination
Customizable questionnaire response-based frameworks
Assessment Workflow
Questionnaire and evaluation process
Limited focuses on investigation and monitoring
Best-in-class assessment and questionnaire workflow
Continuous Monitoring
Real-time change and risk alerting
Native capability real-time alerts and monitoring
Periodic only renewal and reassessment-driven
Deployment & Implementation
Time to First Value
Initial setup and deployment timeline
Pre-configured workflows no additional vendor contracts
Weeks to months with external data setup required
Screening Data
Source and availability of screening intelligence
Built in entity resolution, sub-4hr updates
Requires external data vendor subscriptions

Sayari research. Based on publicly available product documentation and capability analysis. Last reviewed April 2026. ProcessUnity capabilities described based on publicly available information.

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Sayari
  • You need evidence-based risk intelligence, not questionnaire-dependent ratings
  • Beneficial ownership visibility is critical to your TPRM program
  • Continuous monitoring and real-time alerts are requirements
  • You want unified screening across ownership, sanctions, and regulatory risk
  • You need primary-source authoritative entity data for compliance
ProcessUnity May Be Right When
  • Assessment workflow and questionnaire management are your primary need
  • You have strong internal intelligence resources already in place
  • Documentation and compliance audit trails are your main focus
  • You want customizable assessment frameworks for your specific industry
  • You have existing ProcessUnity investment to protect

Note: Many organizations use Sayari and ProcessUnity together – Sayari provides the continuous intelligence layer (ownership, sanctions, screening), while ProcessUnity manages the assessment and documentation workflow. This creates a comprehensive, evidence-informed TPRM program.

GETTING STARTED

Risk Intelligence Beyond the Questionnaire

Building with Sayari means moving from questionnaire-dependent risk to evidence-based intelligence. Your assessments are grounded in real data: ownership structures, sanctions exposure, and continuous monitoring of regulatory changes.

01

Import your vendor list

Upload your current vendor portfolio into Sayari’s world model for comprehensive entity resolution

02

Run baseline intelligence screening

Screen all vendors for ownership, sanctions, PEP, SOE, and adverse media in one comprehensive pass

03

Establish continuous monitoring

Set up real-time alerts on ownership changes, new sanctions matches, and regulatory events

04

Inform assessments with intelligence

Use Sayari intelligence to validate and refine your risk assessments and ratings

TYPICAL TIMELINE

4-6 weeks

From assessment to full deployment with team onboarding

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Sayari vs ProcessUnity FAQ

ProcessUnity is a workflow orchestrator that requires external data subscriptions to produce meaningful risk intelligence for sanctions, AML, and beneficial ownership. Guide provides the data and the workflow in a single product – built on a World Model of 1.5B entities, deployed with pre-configured workflows from day one. For organizations consolidating their vendor stack, Guide replaces ProcessUnity and the data vendors it depends on simultaneously.

ProcessUnity’s screening depends on whichever data source the buyer licenses separately. Signal is entity-resolution-driven screening – 40+ sanctions lists, customers report significantly fewer false positives vs. name-string matching (one top-10 global bank reduced false positives by more than 70%), <4hr updates, API-first.

For ProcessUnity prospects in supply chain risk: 4B+ trade transactions, geospatial risk, transshipment detection, ownership chain traversal to Tier N. ProcessUnity has no answer for supply chain forced labor or ownership intelligence.

ProcessUnity requires separate data subscriptions for sanctions screening, beneficial ownership, and supply chain forced labor intelligence. Guide’s box is full: the World Model for entity resolution, AI-assisted investigation workflows, and structured sourced findings – all included. No separate data vendor required. One contract replaces ProcessUnity plus the data subscriptions it depends on.

Ground your risk ratings in intelligence.

Sayari transforms TPRM from questionnaire-dependent to intelligence-driven. Your risk ratings are informed by real evidence: beneficial ownership structures, sanctions exposure, and continuous monitoring of regulatory changes. Know why you’re rating vendors the way you are.

Request a Demo
3
A Fortune 50 energy trading company consolidated 3 vendors into 1 – Guide replaced the ProcessUnity + data vendor stack
72%
A Top 3 global telecom discovered that 72% of risk identified by Sayari was absent from global watchlists – the gap forms-based assessments with external data can’t close
1.5B+
Entities in the World Model for entity resolution and risk intelligence