Skip to main content
Blog Forced Labor By Sayari Analyst Team

The Forced Labor Compliance Map: 8 Laws, One Global Standard

The EU Forced Labor Regulation, EUDR, Canada’s SCDPA, and Australia’s Modern Slavery Act have joined UFLPA on the compliance calendar. Here’s what the global map looks like now.

Key Takeaways

  • For years, forced labor compliance looked simple: track Xinjiang.
  • Today, multinational supply chains operate under eight major forced labor and supply chain due diligence laws spanning the United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Germany, and France.
  • UFLPA, enacted December 2022, set the first modern standard.
  • The European Union structured forced labor compliance in layers, each law addressing different supply chain actors and commodity scopes.

For years, forced labor compliance looked simple: track Xinjiang. The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), enacted December 2022, treats all Xinjiang goods as derived from forced labor unless companies prove otherwise.

Today, multinational supply chains operate under eight major forced labor and supply chain due diligence laws spanning the United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Germany, and France. A company sourcing from Vietnam, India, and Turkey answers to EUFLR on the European market, Canada’s SCDPA on the Canadian market, Australia’s Modern Slavery Act on Australian operations, and Germany’s LkSG-sometimes all in the same transaction. The challenge is satisfying all eight without redundancy, conflict, or audit failure.

The Original Framework: UFLPA and the Rebuttable Presumption Standard

UFLPA, enacted December 2022, set the first modern standard. It creates a rebuttable presumption: Xinjiang goods are presumed to involve forced labor and are prohibited from U.S. importation unless importers document otherwise. CBP publishes an Entity List including over 100 entities as of early 2025-apparel mills, mining operations, and component suppliers in semiconductors and automotive.

UFLPA applies to all countries but focuses on Xinjiang. It is the only statute with geographic presumption built into its legal text. Enforcement occurs at the border: goods are detained, declarations audited, and importers who cannot rebut the presumption face seizure and penalty.

Every company with U.S. market access must map suppliers, assess forced labor risk, and maintain documentation. But UFLPA does not define due diligence beyond Xinjiang or address broader geographies covered by Europe’s expansion.

The European Expansion: EUFLR, EUDR, LkSG, and Duty of Vigilance

The European Union structured forced labor compliance in layers, each law addressing different supply chain actors and commodity scopes.

EUFLR (EU Forced Labor Regulation), adopted by the European Parliament in 2024, is the closest parallel to UFLPA and the broadest. EUFLR bans the placement, making available, or placing on the EU market of goods made wholly or in part with forced labor. Unlike UFLPA, EUFLR applies to all countries and all goods with no geographic carve-out. It requires companies to conduct supply chain due diligence-identifying and mitigating forced labor risks across all tiers. Enforcement begins in 2027. The due diligence requirement is prospective and systematic: companies must assess suppliers, monitor violations, and document remediation. LkSG (Germany’s Supply Chain Due Diligence Act), effective January 2023, applies to companies with 1,000+ employees. It mandates human rights due diligence across the full supply chain-forced labor, child labor, wage theft, unsafe conditions. Fines reach 2 percent of global annual turnover. German authorities have begun auditing large multinationals. France’s Duty of Vigilance Law (enacted 2017) applies to companies with 5,000+ employees globally. It requires corporate vigilance plans identifying and preventing human rights violations, environmental damage, and corruption throughout supply chains. Enforcement has accelerated since 2021. EUDR (EU Deforestation Regulation), though not a forced labor statute, overlaps with forced labor compliance. EUDR requires supply chain traceability for seven commodities-timber, cattle, cocoa, soy, palm oil, rubber, coffee-imported into the EU. Cocoa supply chain mapping for EUDR compliance simultaneously gathers intelligence for EUFLR forced labor due diligence.

The Commonwealth Framework: UK, Canada, and Australia

UK Modern Slavery Act (2015) requires entities operating in the UK with annual global turnover exceeding £36 million to publish annual modern slavery statements. Enforcement is lightweight-statements are published but penalties are rare. The standard is transparency and accountability; the lever is reputational and market access. Canada’s SCDPA (Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act), effective June 2024, applies to entities with revenues exceeding CAD $20 million or assets exceeding CAD $20 million, or 250+ employees. It requires annual reports detailing measures to prevent forced labor and child labor in supply chains and imported goods. Enforcement includes audits and penalties for false or misleading reports. Early adopters already face questions from Canadian authorities. Australia’s Modern Slavery Act (2018) mirrors the UK model: large entities file annual statements. Threshold: AUD $100 million annual turnover. Australian corporations commissioners have begun naming non-compliant companies, creating market pressure.

Building a Compliance Program That Covers All Eight

The eight laws share a common core: supply chain visibility, risk assessment, and documented due diligence.

Start with supply chain mapping. The first due diligence step is knowing suppliers, where they source, and what labor practices they employ. Without a supply chain map, audits and documentation are hollow. Establish risk assessment criteria spanning all eight laws. Forced labor risk is elevated in certain geographies, commodities, and production methods. Xinjiang is a UFLPA trigger. Cocoa, coffee, timber, and palm oil carry elevated risk globally. Apparel, electronics, and food processing are high-risk sectors. Document due diligence activities. LkSG and EUFLR require written policies. UK MSA, Canada’s SCDPA, and Australia’s MSA require public statements. UFLPA requires import declarations and CBP correspondence. Invest in documentation systems allowing single findings to populate multiple filings. Prepare for audits. Germany’s LkSG authorities have begun auditing multinationals. CBP continues UFLPA enforcement. Canadian authorities audit SCDPA filers. Maintain evidence of supplier assessments, remediation timelines, and escalation protocols.

Companies recognizing these eight laws as a unified ecosystem-with shared foundation in supply chain visibility and documented due diligence-can navigate with confidence.

Sayari’s Map platform provides real-time supply chain visibility across 250+ jurisdictions, accessing 11.7 billion+ primary-source records and 4 billion trade transactions. Supply chain teams use Map to identify high-risk suppliers, trace commodity origins across tiers, and document due diligence activities satisfying UFLPA, EUFLR, LkSG, Canada’s SCDPA, and other major regimes. Request a demo to map your supply chain today.

Identify forced labor risk in your supply chain

Map ownership structures, forced labor exposure, and sub-tier suppliers at any scale.

Request a demo