Skip to main content
Investigation Brief 2026 Published April 2026 · Sayari

The war on fraud.
Protecting federal benefits programs.

The March 2026 executive order establishing the Task Force to Eliminate Fraud is the most consequential federal escalation in benefits program integrity in a generation. 30-day risk assessments, 60-day minimum control requirements, 90-day implementation plans — and the threat of federal funding loss for jurisdictions that fall short. Standard screening tools were built for a different threat. This brief examines what network-level commercial intelligence reveals through three active enforcement cases.

GovernmentHealthcare FraudBeneficial OwnershipMedicareMedicaid
Download this brief
The War on Fraud: Protecting Federal Benefits Programs cover

The War on Fraud: Protecting Federal Benefits Programs

Free, no form required. Sayari Intelligence Brief, April 2026.

In this brief
$100B+
estimated annual Medicare and Medicaid fraud losses across federal benefits programs
$10.6B
in fraudulent Medicare claims in a single Russia-linked scheme prosecuted under Operation Gold Rush
75K+
individuals and entities on the OIG List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE)

The new federal mandate.

On March 16, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order creating the Task Force to Eliminate Fraud within the Executive Office of the President. The order coordinates eleven federal departments — DOJ, HHS, Treasury, Agriculture, Labor, HUD, Education, Veterans Affairs, Homeland Security, and others — in a unified strategy to protect federal housing, food, medical, cash assistance, and other benefit programs from fraud, waste, and abuse.

The mandates carry hard deadlines: each member agency has 30 days to identify its highest-risk fraud transactions; 60 days to coordinate adoption of minimum anti-fraud controls including screening, identity verification, and pre-payment integrity checks; and 90 days to submit a measurable implementation plan. Federal funds may be withheld from jurisdictions that fail to meet anti-fraud requirements. The DOJ’s new Division for National Fraud Enforcement, activated in January 2026, centralizes federal fraud prosecution. CMS has imposed a nationwide temporary moratorium on new DMEPOS enrollments, one of the highest-risk provider categories for Medicare fraud.

The fraud landscape.

Fraud networks operating against federal benefits programs now employ the same structural sophistication used by transnational organized crime: layered corporate ownership designed to defeat standard screening, “phoenix” companies that reconstitute under new identities following enforcement actions, and nominee operators who provide human cover for criminal enterprises with no legitimate business purpose. Estimates from federal oversight bodies and academic researchers point to annual losses ranging from $100 billion to more than $500 billion across Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal benefit programs.

Five recurring architectural patterns surface across enforcement cases:

  • Beneficial owner concealment — multi-layered corporate structures including shell companies, nominee operators, and international holding entities in low-transparency jurisdictions.
  • Phoenix companies — criminal networks reconstitute under new entity names after enforcement, often at the same address with overlapping officers, exploiting the lag between exclusion and re-screening.
  • Address clustering — dozens or hundreds of ostensibly independent businesses registered at a single commercial address, visible only through network-level analysis.
  • Nominee operators — individuals appearing as owners or officers across many unrelated entities, providing human cover with no independent professional footprint.
  • Exclusion circumvention — excluded individuals continue receiving federal payments through newly formed entities, associated parties, or nominee cover.

Operation Gold Rush.

In June 2025, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York indicted eleven members of a Russia-based transnational healthcare fraud and money laundering scheme — the largest healthcare fraud case by loss amount ever recorded by the DOJ. The network purchased medical equipment companies using nominee owners, submitted more than $10.6 billion in fraudulent Medicare claims using stolen patient data, and funneled proceeds through international shell companies.

Sayari analysis extends the case far beyond the eleven indicted defendants. Georgia Secretary of State records identify Jason Onoufrienko, one of the indicted defendants, as an officer of Main Street DME Inc. Alabama records link him to Express Healthcare Inc. Sayari graph analysis then surfaces a connection through Main Street DME to two individuals who founded sixteen Florida-based healthcare companies between 2020 and 2025 — all sharing one of two small office addresses, all maintaining active National Provider Identifier (NPI) numbers, most lacking maintained websites or verifiable operational footprints, and several with ostensible CEOs whose only presence in corporate records is on these entities. This analysis — which would take investigators months through manual record review — was generated in hours.

Los Angeles hospice fraud.

Hospice fraud is one of the most acute and rapidly escalating Medicare fraud threats in the United States. A 2022 California State Auditor report found a 1,500% increase in hospice companies in Los Angeles County since 2010 — six times the national average relative to the elderly population. The typical LA County hospice billed Medicare roughly $29,000 per patient, more than double the national average of $13,200. One Los Angeles hospice targeted by April 2026 federal action reported a 97% patient survival rate against the roughly 20% national norm.

Sayari analysis of California Secretary of State records, PPP loan recipient data, the SBA Dynamic Small Business database, and USPTO trademark applications identified more than 270 hospice businesses registered within roughly eight blocks of a single street in Van Nuys. At least 250 share addresses at the same Friar Street office building, which lists only 62 suites. Across the network, individuals appear as directors of as many as 23 separate hospice entities. The director of Van Nuys-based Caring Nurses Hospice Inc. is also director of at least eighteen other hospices spread across Los Angeles, Glendale, and Las Vegas. A small number of highly-networked individuals control disproportionate shares of the cluster — the structural signature of mass incorporation, a recognized red flag for healthcare fraud.

Excluded providers, ongoing payments.

The HHS OIG List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE) contains more than 75,000 records — individuals and entities formally barred from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs. No payment may be made for any items or services furnished, ordered, or prescribed by an excluded party, regardless of who submits the claim. Yet excluded providers continue receiving federal payments through new entity formation, employment by associated parties, nominee cover, and jurisdictional gaps between federal and state exclusion lists.

Sayari analysis comparing SAM and LEIE exclusions data with HHS Medicaid payments from 2018 through 2024 surfaced 2,228 payment records to excluded entities that occurred after those entities were added to the exclusion list. One provider continued receiving Medicaid payments for more than ten years after its exclusion, accumulating $8.9 million in disbursements. The provider’s mailing address was a P.O. box; its physical address was a residential property in Kansas, with no evident business location. Network-level exclusion screening — starting from a known excluded entity and identifying associated entities through shared officers, addresses, agents, and ownership connections — closes a gap that current entity-by-entity screening cannot.

How Sayari helps

Sayari’s Commercial World Model resolves 10.6B+ primary-source records across 250+ jurisdictions, with AI-enabled network analysis that automatically surfaces shared officers, addresses, and ownership connections. Network maps generated in hours, not months — critical for the Task Force’s 30-day risk assessment mandate. Historical records detect phoenix companies. Integration with exclusion, sanctions, and adverse-records databases closes the gap between entity-level screening and network-level fraud. Publicly available commercial records create releasable, unclassified intelligence products for prosecution and intelligence sharing.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

War on Fraud FAQ

An interagency task force established by President Trump’s March 16, 2026 executive order, coordinating eleven federal departments — including DOJ, HHS, Treasury, Agriculture, Labor, HUD, Education, Veterans Affairs, and Homeland Security — in a unified campaign to protect federal benefits programs from fraud, waste, and abuse. The Task Force operates within the Executive Office of the President and has set hard deadlines: 30-day risk assessments by member agencies, 60-day minimum anti-fraud control requirements, and 90-day implementation plans. Federal funds may be withheld from jurisdictions that fail to meet anti-fraud requirements.

Modern fraud networks targeting federal benefits programs use the structural sophistication of transnational organized crime: multi-layered corporate ownership designed to obscure beneficial owners; phoenix companies that reconstitute under new entity names after enforcement; nominee operators who appear in corporate records as owners or officers but exercise no actual control; address clustering where dozens or hundreds of apparently independent entities share a single commercial address; and exclusion circumvention through newly formed entities or associated parties. Standard rules-based screening identifies known bad actors at the entity level — it does not surface the broader networks those actors operate through.

Operation Gold Rush led to the June 2025 indictment of eleven members of a Russia-linked network that submitted $10.6 billion in fraudulent Medicare claims — the largest healthcare fraud case by loss amount in DOJ history. Starting from one indicted defendant, Sayari’s network analysis surfaced sixteen additional Florida-based healthcare entities with shared addresses, nominee CEOs, and active National Provider Identifier numbers — work that would take manual investigators months, generated in hours. The analysis suggests the underlying fraud network extends substantially beyond the eleven indicted defendants and underscores the importance of CMS’s nationwide temporary moratorium on new DMEPOS enrollments.

Entity-level screening checks a single provider, vendor, or beneficiary against known watchlists, exclusion databases, or sanctions lists. It catches known bad actors — but cannot see the networks they operate through. Network-level analysis, the approach Sayari enables, starts from a known entity and automatically traces ownership, control, and identifier relationships (shared officers, addresses, registered agents, phone numbers) across entire commercial registries. This surfaces phoenix companies, exclusion circumvention through associated parties, address-clustering schemes, and nominee patterns that single-entity screening misses by design. For the Task Force’s 30-day risk assessment mandate, this means agencies can characterize entire provider populations against fraud indicators rather than reviewing individual records manually.

Download the full PDF directly from this page — no form required. The brief includes the full case-study analyses (Operation Gold Rush, Los Angeles hospice fraud, exclusion circumvention), the executive order’s mandate breakdown, and the Sayari capability framework. To see how the Sayari Commercial World Model would apply to your agency or institution’s fraud-detection workflow, request a briefing from our team.

Get the intelligence advantage your mission requires.

Request a briefing from the Sayari analytics team.

Request a briefing Back to investigation briefs